why do some christians feel that muslims who come to the united states?
why do some christians feel that muslims who come to the united states work hard,pay their fare share of taxes,obey the law,and help contribute to the community and american society in general should have less rights than christians?
Religion & Spirituality - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I don't know anyone who thinks muslims should have less rights. People just get ticked off at immigrants having special rights catering to them. Or when they have to sensor stuff of their favorite television show *south parkcough cough* because it "offends" some people. Either way muslims should be entitled to the same rights as everybody else.
2 :
They do? I'm leaving America right now! No seriously, I'm going back home in less than a month. I had a horrible year in this country! :(
3 :
as i can c, it is them who feel it that way. no one is giving anybody a hard time. stop being a cry baby.
4 :
I don't. The problem is their friends who are not like them.
Monday, June 21, 2010
Monday, June 14, 2010
Do you think that Mexico and The United States should work together to build their economies
Do you think that Mexico and The United States should work together to build their economies?
i am saying this because the European countries have worked together to make the EU and now there economy is strong enough to compete with ours. I am just saying that Mexico and The US should do the same we should be helping them out and they should work with us. Oh and for the illegal immigration i say we let them in and make them US citizens
Politics - 14 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
No. No. No.
2 :
The problem with Mexico is it is entirely corrupt. Ask any Mexican and he'll tell you his government is corrupt. You can't build anything with corruption.
3 :
Maybe you should pick up a dictionary to help you define the word illegal.
4 :
The USD is already deflated enough in value. Combining it with the peso would only further deflate its value.
5 :
Are you aware of the Mexican culture of corruption? I've known first hand how things work down there, not pretty!
6 :
we might as well. In 6 months we'll be so poor that we'll need a loan from them to stay afloat. YES WE CAN!!!!
7 :
Yes. I support a North American Union, it would really strengthen North America's economy and open trade.
8 :
No because we'd have to pay to lift their infrastructure. Look at what illegal immigration is doing to our schools and services, already. We can't afford them. Also, I think individuals are best served by the most local government possible and that special interests rule as government is more centralized. I think the EU was a bad idea. Why don't they let the people have referenda on the Lisbon Treaty? Because it would fail. It was failing before they changed it from a Constitution to a treaty to avoid a popular vote in all countries but Ireland. Ireland voted it down, now they are making Ireland vote again. And again and again, presumably until a vote comes in that they like. If it is such a good idea, why doesn't anyone want it?
9 :
Sure first send all the illegal workers and family's back so they can work there.NO AMNESTY.
10 :
The United States has built its economy just fine
11 :
NO on everything you just suggested. Why should we help them out??? Why? And hell no to giving amnesty. They should come here legal in the first damn place.
12 :
I'm brittish and thus an EU member and whilst we are working together, we are not entirely on the same page. Our economies are still competing together rather than working together. What the EU does is makes distribution of workforce/regulations and business more accessable per country which helps the economies but again it's not a 1 economy superstate. As for Mexico I have no doubt that the illegal immigration is a vtal part of the economy, however it is in America's interest to not give these illegal's rights because after all if they have rights they may stop doing the jobs that Americans do not want to do and for poor pay. It's called social reproduction and aslong as Mexicans are denied rights, then they cannot develop.
13 :
we missed the boat back in the 1800's.we should have taken over mexico then,by now the people would be up to speed and we would have a great country.oh well...
14 :
Go to youtube, the guy from Boston, harsh laws youtube wont let me post it. When immigration laws are similar
i am saying this because the European countries have worked together to make the EU and now there economy is strong enough to compete with ours. I am just saying that Mexico and The US should do the same we should be helping them out and they should work with us. Oh and for the illegal immigration i say we let them in and make them US citizens
Politics - 14 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
No. No. No.
2 :
The problem with Mexico is it is entirely corrupt. Ask any Mexican and he'll tell you his government is corrupt. You can't build anything with corruption.
3 :
Maybe you should pick up a dictionary to help you define the word illegal.
4 :
The USD is already deflated enough in value. Combining it with the peso would only further deflate its value.
5 :
Are you aware of the Mexican culture of corruption? I've known first hand how things work down there, not pretty!
6 :
we might as well. In 6 months we'll be so poor that we'll need a loan from them to stay afloat. YES WE CAN!!!!
7 :
Yes. I support a North American Union, it would really strengthen North America's economy and open trade.
8 :
No because we'd have to pay to lift their infrastructure. Look at what illegal immigration is doing to our schools and services, already. We can't afford them. Also, I think individuals are best served by the most local government possible and that special interests rule as government is more centralized. I think the EU was a bad idea. Why don't they let the people have referenda on the Lisbon Treaty? Because it would fail. It was failing before they changed it from a Constitution to a treaty to avoid a popular vote in all countries but Ireland. Ireland voted it down, now they are making Ireland vote again. And again and again, presumably until a vote comes in that they like. If it is such a good idea, why doesn't anyone want it?
9 :
Sure first send all the illegal workers and family's back so they can work there.NO AMNESTY.
10 :
The United States has built its economy just fine
11 :
NO on everything you just suggested. Why should we help them out??? Why? And hell no to giving amnesty. They should come here legal in the first damn place.
12 :
I'm brittish and thus an EU member and whilst we are working together, we are not entirely on the same page. Our economies are still competing together rather than working together. What the EU does is makes distribution of workforce/regulations and business more accessable per country which helps the economies but again it's not a 1 economy superstate. As for Mexico I have no doubt that the illegal immigration is a vtal part of the economy, however it is in America's interest to not give these illegal's rights because after all if they have rights they may stop doing the jobs that Americans do not want to do and for poor pay. It's called social reproduction and aslong as Mexicans are denied rights, then they cannot develop.
13 :
we missed the boat back in the 1800's.we should have taken over mexico then,by now the people would be up to speed and we would have a great country.oh well...
14 :
Go to youtube, the guy from Boston, harsh laws youtube wont let me post it. When immigration laws are similar
Monday, June 7, 2010
How many people in the United States still work for minimum wage
How many people in the United States still work for minimum wage?
Trivia - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
the ones who are not smart. The lazy ones. The ones who want to eat. ME! but I dont now.
2 :
Like 70% of the workforce.
3 :
Of the 8.4 million workers (age 18 to 64) whose wages and incomes would increase with a one-dollar raise in the minimum wage, 2.7 million (32%) are the parents of 4.7 million children. Of the 2.7 million parents who earned at or near the current minimum wage in 1999, 63% had family incomes below $25,000.
4 :
at least all the women who are working have that wage!! lol
5 :
A person does NOT have to be lazy to earn minimum wage. I have a college degree, but because of where I live...(I have children and moving is not an affordable option, nor is traveling too far to work)...minimum wage jobs are all that is available...and I'm not talking fastfood and gas stations...I'm talking college level jobs. There are more people on welfare in this area than I have ever seen. It is almost like a status symbol, and even though I am eligible (and pay taxes), I refuse to fall into the trap. There are people who use welfare as a stepping stool, but too many use it as a stool. If a person is working every minute they can; are raising self-respecting, law-abiding children; pay their bills without increasing their debt foolishly; do NOT expect handouts; and have a goal to be self-sufficient and are working toward that...KUDOS to them.
Trivia - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
the ones who are not smart. The lazy ones. The ones who want to eat. ME! but I dont now.
2 :
Like 70% of the workforce.
3 :
Of the 8.4 million workers (age 18 to 64) whose wages and incomes would increase with a one-dollar raise in the minimum wage, 2.7 million (32%) are the parents of 4.7 million children. Of the 2.7 million parents who earned at or near the current minimum wage in 1999, 63% had family incomes below $25,000.
4 :
at least all the women who are working have that wage!! lol
5 :
A person does NOT have to be lazy to earn minimum wage. I have a college degree, but because of where I live...(I have children and moving is not an affordable option, nor is traveling too far to work)...minimum wage jobs are all that is available...and I'm not talking fastfood and gas stations...I'm talking college level jobs. There are more people on welfare in this area than I have ever seen. It is almost like a status symbol, and even though I am eligible (and pay taxes), I refuse to fall into the trap. There are people who use welfare as a stepping stool, but too many use it as a stool. If a person is working every minute they can; are raising self-respecting, law-abiding children; pay their bills without increasing their debt foolishly; do NOT expect handouts; and have a goal to be self-sufficient and are working toward that...KUDOS to them.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
How do I work in the united states
How do I work in the united states?
I'm from Canada but I would like to live and work in the united states because of the industry I am in. I know you need a green card, but how do you get one?
Immigration - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
This link should give you all the info you need --
2 :
Just marry an american babe. or dude if you are moving to MA.
3 :
For temporary employment, you don't need a green card. That you can only obtain if you have an immediate blood relative who is a US citizen and is willing & able to sponsor your immigration. Then you wait in line for admission. For a temporary employment visa, you need to find a job with an employer which is willing and able to obtain an employment visa for you. You neglect to mention your qualifications, but the most popular is the H1-b visa. You need a minimum of a baccalaureate degree and at least 2 yrs experience in a position which requires a minimum of a baccalaureate degree. H1-b visas for 2009 have already been issued. The applications for 2010 I hear are already oversubscribed. They'll be processed starting in April. You probably can't get one till 2011. The company has to get labor certification from the Dept of Labor (prove there are no US citizens qualified for the job) before they submit an application for you. These are increasingly difficult to get with so many Americans losing their jobs these days. For that matter, jobs are increasingly hard to find these days. Don't get your hopes up for the time being. Note: the Dept of Labor reported that 533,000 jobs were lost in the month of November. That's their "adjusted" figures. If you go to the actual data, you will find that the number of employed persons declined by 1.2 million during November. If you continue using the same methodology used prior to the Clinton Administration (they changed the methodology in 1993), you will find that actual unemployment in the US now exceeds 16%, not 6.7%.
I'm from Canada but I would like to live and work in the united states because of the industry I am in. I know you need a green card, but how do you get one?
Immigration - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
This link should give you all the info you need --
2 :
Just marry an american babe. or dude if you are moving to MA.
3 :
For temporary employment, you don't need a green card. That you can only obtain if you have an immediate blood relative who is a US citizen and is willing & able to sponsor your immigration. Then you wait in line for admission. For a temporary employment visa, you need to find a job with an employer which is willing and able to obtain an employment visa for you. You neglect to mention your qualifications, but the most popular is the H1-b visa. You need a minimum of a baccalaureate degree and at least 2 yrs experience in a position which requires a minimum of a baccalaureate degree. H1-b visas for 2009 have already been issued. The applications for 2010 I hear are already oversubscribed. They'll be processed starting in April. You probably can't get one till 2011. The company has to get labor certification from the Dept of Labor (prove there are no US citizens qualified for the job) before they submit an application for you. These are increasingly difficult to get with so many Americans losing their jobs these days. For that matter, jobs are increasingly hard to find these days. Don't get your hopes up for the time being. Note: the Dept of Labor reported that 533,000 jobs were lost in the month of November. That's their "adjusted" figures. If you go to the actual data, you will find that the number of employed persons declined by 1.2 million during November. If you continue using the same methodology used prior to the Clinton Administration (they changed the methodology in 1993), you will find that actual unemployment in the US now exceeds 16%, not 6.7%.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)